A conceptual model of a very efficient (possibly over-unity) energy system for the home. At its base, is the water fuel cell, which acts as both a high-efficiency water electrolyzer using no catalysts, but acts also as a fuel cell, when combined with the Electron Extraction Circuit (EEC). In this combination, the water fuel cell produces an electrical current by extracting the free electrons that are thrown off once the hydrogen & oxygen atoms are broken from the covelant bonds of the two H atoms. Both a charged gas, called HHO (or hydroxy gas), and an electrical current are produced with the water fuel cell. The HHO gas is a fully combustible compound that is perfect for combustion applications. Most internal combustion engines can be modified to burn it, however I chose the quasiturbine in this design, because if it’s efficiency & simplicity. I left out a compressor aft the water fuel cell, as the quasiturbine must run on compressed gas or other fuel, such as steam. The rest of the schematic is modular, and I imagine the alternator could be 350 KW, if powered by a 5L, 500 HP Quasiturbine, which should run well on the water fuel cell running in a continuous closed loop mode. The water supply would occasionally be replenished by tap water, or the system could operate using grey water. In addition, the water fuel cell can be used as a water purifier.
More here:
http://www.sustainableabq.com/plan.htm
For those who are developing their own clean energy and zero-point energy systems, or for those who would like to be involved with this promotion, please visit:
http://www.theorionproject.org
I agree. I made this over a year ago. It was to illustrate a few different over-unity devices & show in one unit. Solid state is much better, but you can still have moving parts and keep it reliable. Id ditch the Quasiturbine and use a Bedini/Newman/Brandt motor to turn the cavitation heater, and/or also supply energy. The newest version of the Papp engine is also a better idea. The water fuel cell is better suited for water purification or to run a car on.
A few major problems with this.
Stirlings, Hydrosonic pumps, motors, gearings are NOISY, SQUEEKY, LEAKY and unpredictable shits, these mechanical things wear off and require maintenable and oversight, not good for long time residental use, sorry this a wrong way to do this.
You need everything SOLID STATE, non-mechanical, non-gas phase, not noisy moving parts that break and fail etc.
But nice job with designs, planning and all.
Lets distinguish “Perpetual Motion” from “Closed Loop Over-Unity.” Perpetual motion implies it moves forever, which is impossible because machines will break down eventually. WFCs are mostly solid state (no moving parts).
Google “PES Suppression.”
Energy from the Vacuum will take time to prove, but I really dont care how its explained. I only want these to become commercialized and available to everyone.
Have you seen the links, or looked at Xogen? Have you looked at Blacklight Power? The Bedini & Newman Motors are also over-unity & grab vacuum energy (“cold electricity).
Water Fuel Cells have been replicated and DO work and ARE over-unity. Google Bob Boyce D9 PDF & learn more. Academia rejects these devices because they are stuck in Newtonian Physics. Big oil & energy interests suppress this technology because they cant meter it or compete with it once decentralized.
the quantum vacuum theory is not even proven fully… so no claims using this theory! and I just wonder, let’s say the big companied are against such discovery because of such and such reasons. Why is there not even ONE company/institution who would sponsor this idea and use it in the right way? At least the academic institutions would do something about it if it really worked… perpetual motion machines have always been proven wrong; but I hope his H2O energy source actually works!
How can you be so sure that it is impossible? Maybe Faraday missed something. He never had 316L stainless steel or used PWM when he wrote the rules for electrolysis. Stan Meyer’s devices were well over-unity 700% efficient. Other groups (includeing H2Earth) are recreating these devices using no catalysts. The extra energy is coming from the quantum vacuum (heat untracable).
Before you decide to shun this as junk science, see my videos with David Wenbert, Xogen, Moray King & Steven Greer.
in water cells, an electrical current supply is required in order to break the H2O molecule into H2 & O. where are you gonna get the current from?!! assuming that you got, the amount of electricity generated from reaction of oxyhydrogen gas is NEVER going to be efficient enoughtto make up the used current for water decomposition. if it did, it means that the efficiency is 100%!! & even if its resulting energy is even more, then we are generating energy out of nothing!! it’s impossible bro…
Interesting video. It may not be completely accurate but it does give a lot of good starting points.
There’s a lot I’ve learned about ZPE since I made this video. I would not use the Quasiturbine, because the HHO gas must be pressurized to work in the QT. I’d instead try a microturbine or use the gas to heat graphite up and take the hot air into a stirling engine genset.
An ever better option is to use the geovoltaic energy pump. This avoids the dangers of using gas on demand & is a much simpler way to generate electricity from the quantum vacuum (AKA zero-point energy, or ZPE.
b.t.w. i wouldnt bother with the h2 cell. i would use a battery already charged with electricity preferrably charged from green sources.
one way to capture more energy would be to add a ‘cavitation motor’ ( watch?v=yh_-DUKQ4Uw&feature=related )
to the process, adding thermoelectric capturing devices to that. the pressure from the heated water would create steam power which could also be captured. you make that dude i want HALF!!
Basing a home system on a turbine is ridiculous and primitive. There are more effiecent ways to convert HHO to electricity.
DANGER!: Attention HHO people using LECTROLYTES!!!!!
Electrolyte systems are nothing more than electroplating units. They are NOT Stan Meyers systems. Yes they produce Hydrogen, but they also produce, CO2 and trace other gases due to the electrolyte. THE USED WATER IS POISONOUS! DO NT DRINK IT! DO NOT THROW IT OUT IN THE BACKYARD! IT IS TOXIC AFTER ELECTROLYTE IS ADDED. BE CAREFUL HOW YOU DISPOSE OF IT! STOP USING ELECTROLYTE AND LEARN HOW THIS PROCESS IS SUPPOSED TO WORK CLEANLY.
esse é uma merda
I agree – simpler is better. This was a way to show a lot of cool technology working together, but I don’t know if it will work!
I’ve learned much more since I made this video. If the EEC were available, that would make the QT & the cavitation heater & generator unecessary. Also, the steam may power the QT at 500 psi, but the HHO should NOT be compressed. HHO might be fed in the QT at the ignition point (at 5 psi) and mix with the steam, during ignition. There’s a lot of unknowns here.
Nice , good alt-tech integration.our mind likes the complex things…but maybe can be more simple, simplicity is better for a global implementation. 🙂
Great idea.
What about a turbine to capture energy from the steam on it’s way to the water heater.
very nice!!!
well built it then if it works sell it to my residential street so we can get off the grid
impressive
you are a damn good engineer. don’t let anybody say any different. awsome job!!
What is the website URL? where this graphic is hosted with their links? Amazin concept. Congrats. Wish I can see more
Yes, I know what you mean. I hate it too! I sound like Bob Newhart. I’ve learned a lot more about these technologies since then. I had over 30,000 hits on this video on my old YouTube account. Check out the links and infor in the “About This Video” for more information. I’ll try to update and submit a new version soon, & try not to studder this time!
Very Nice, please next time organize what you have to say before hand, it is very interesting but it was painful to listen to your voice.