My HHO Generator in my 2004 Hyundai Santa Fe. From 360 to a full tank to 570. 19 gallon tank. 30MPG AWD 3.5Liter V6
27 thoughts on “My HHO Generator in my 2004 Hyundai Santa Fe”
rubasyosays:
I have the same HHO generator like yours with 1liter per minute production, please help me on how to install this on my suzuki 3cylinder engine. By the way it is a carbeurator type. Help please
Boyntonstusays:
volts, amps, spacing?
mpg before/after?
monkey505boysays:
I live in Santa Fe. I could bring over a MPG meter. But it I did that, you would discover the MPG goes *down* when your engine runs harder to generate the hydrogen.
Maybe that will finally prove this is all bullshit.
john29302says:
i wanted to see how much voltage was on your sensor but you kept showing your rpm over and over
Kricnitsays:
Genius, what happens when HHO is burned, it becomes H2O which is water. This water/steam formation after the burn absorbs/captures significantly more joules of heat energy than the other gases exiting the heat chamber are capable of doing. Flame velocity is irrelevant as claims of increased fuel efficiency remain unsubstantiated without reduction of fuel input. The excess fuel that is burn is required to reduce harmful NOx emissions, and this mod is illegal period.
Kricnitsays:
“atmospheric NOx eventually forms nitric acid, which contributes to acid rain.[5] NOx emissions are regulated in the United States by the Environmental Protection Agency,.” (Wikipedia) When you reduce the fuel input cylinder temperatures rise dramatically if they are not controlled. The water formation after the combustion burn provide the necessary cooling for the change in fuel input. Check out endothermic cooling if you need more information.
Triple88asays:
lol and if you knew what you’re saying you would be laughing at your self. HHO and H2O are 2 DIFFERENT THINGS. One is GAS OTHER IS LIQUID!!! This is not water injection, this is feeding hydrogen and oxygen gasses into the intake. Do you even know how fast gasoline burns? If you did you would know that modern vehicles burn less than 50% of the gasoline sprayed into the cylinder which is not efficient at all.
Kricnitsays:
A variance of avg speed of 5mph in tank of fuel is sufficient to give inaccurate fuel consumption data and most are improperly measuring there rates of fuel consumption. It requires very steady speeds that are repeatable. Most just run their daily commute and believe idling times and speed variations average out. They don’t over the period that is measured by most and claims to the contrary are erroneous.
Kricnitsays:
H2 doesn’t create a more eff burn, it provides cooling in form of water vapor in cyl. Same can be accomplished with direct water injection and turning down fuel rate w/ o2 sensor. Extra fuel is burned to reduce NOx emissions and messing with your O2 sensor is illegally modifying the vehicle emissions. The gasoline is already burned efficiently in most modern vehicles as is verified by so many posting that this has no effect on their fuel consumption.
Wayneman1234says:
I have a 86 chevy pick up, see tater waynes on you tube. I hooked the thing up and its working fine. went fron 14 mpg to 26.6 mph on a 4.3 litre v 6. I guess i just hit the sweet spot.
MikPilsays:
Notice any pinging from engine?
wh333tsays:
Hrm. I definitely don’t understand it but w00t!
Triple88asays:
no just a piggy back to retard the timing a bit.
wh333tsays:
So are you talking like a programmable chip? Like a Hondata?
Triple88asays:
To properly make it run,you will need more than to tap into the O2 and lean it out. I mean would you rather burn a hole in your cylinder or would you rather make it work right even if it costs a bit more? On some cars they have knock sensors which retard the timing automatically when they hear premature detonation however this is not the cure as it takes a while for it to react. There was a video of some guy running it on i think a corolla and you could really tell it was pinging bad.
wh333tsays:
Sounds expensive…
I thought all these guys were doing was changing the o2 sensor somewhat and voila. If you have to change all your ECU timings and shit this is gonna be a bit expensive and not very price effective for the average driver 🙁
Triple88asays:
well thats retarding the intake and exhaust ports and you gotta have special gears that allow you do that, but what i’m talking about is when the plug fires, not when the valves open. It’s pretty much all done by computer besides some very old vehicles that used mechanical sprockets that shifted depending on engine speed. You gotta use a computer chip that can allow you to trick the computer from the factory on the car (ECU) so it sends the signal later or at least so you can modify the signal.
wh333tsays:
Yea, but to retard the timings on a carb’d vehicle you just open the head and move the cam ahead or behind a degree or two?
Triple88asays:
even on a carb vehicle, you still need to retard the timing.The type of fuel system does not matter.Simply when the spark plug fires up,gasoline takes longer to ignite then hydrogen so the spark plug actually fires before the cylinder reaches the top of the stroke (Top Dead Center) so technically the fuel is already burning while the piston is still moving up.Now since hydrogen burns faster,you need to slow the spark plug a bit otherwise you get combustion while the piston is still on the way UP
wh333tsays:
Sounds difficult to do.
I think I want to hho boost a carb’d vehicle. sounds like it would be way easier.
Triple88asays:
No not yet. I’m looking for a some electronics that allows me to retard the timing since i dont feel like blowing through a piston. i drive a jeep which has a very low revving I6 engine and this is even worse with the wrong timing since premature combustion is even harder on lower rpms.
wh333tsays:
Yea for sure dude. I meant pretty much the same thing. Do you got an HHO boosted vehicle?
Triple88asays:
oh no no man dont get me wrong. No arguments here. I rather get the information straight then quite halfway and then start over a month after:) You know what i’m saying right? Many times you see those good thread on the forums where people start off and everything is good and all the sudden everything stops without any feedback or without anything being proven or not proven at all. I mean i rather know something doesnt work than have no info on it at all.
Himom2032says:
I made mine for like 10 bucks.
Himom2032says:
No need for one. The O2 sensor on the exhaust will sense how lean/rich it is, and adjust fuel accordingly. If that helps at all.
I have just finished building my own HHO generator, and it works a treat! Heaps of gas when hooked up to my car battery. Will be installing it this weekend. My friend met a guy from Sydney yesterday, who has the system in his 5.7l v12 jaguar. He is very excited about the initial results…close to 30% better mileage.Don’t listen to the sceptics…….let them continue to pay top price for fuel and pollute the environment. Their choice.I purchased the ebook from water4gas and have built my own to a slightly different design, but heeding their
advice on the overall setup. The technology works, and is nothing new. For the sceptics,this technology has been suppressed for almost 100 years. NASA uses it, so why shouldn’t we? Enjoy your experimenting.
I have the same HHO generator like yours with 1liter per minute production, please help me on how to install this on my suzuki 3cylinder engine. By the way it is a carbeurator type. Help please
volts, amps, spacing?
mpg before/after?
I live in Santa Fe. I could bring over a MPG meter. But it I did that, you would discover the MPG goes *down* when your engine runs harder to generate the hydrogen.
Maybe that will finally prove this is all bullshit.
i wanted to see how much voltage was on your sensor but you kept showing your rpm over and over
Genius, what happens when HHO is burned, it becomes H2O which is water. This water/steam formation after the burn absorbs/captures significantly more joules of heat energy than the other gases exiting the heat chamber are capable of doing. Flame velocity is irrelevant as claims of increased fuel efficiency remain unsubstantiated without reduction of fuel input. The excess fuel that is burn is required to reduce harmful NOx emissions, and this mod is illegal period.
“atmospheric NOx eventually forms nitric acid, which contributes to acid rain.[5] NOx emissions are regulated in the United States by the Environmental Protection Agency,.” (Wikipedia) When you reduce the fuel input cylinder temperatures rise dramatically if they are not controlled. The water formation after the combustion burn provide the necessary cooling for the change in fuel input. Check out endothermic cooling if you need more information.
lol and if you knew what you’re saying you would be laughing at your self. HHO and H2O are 2 DIFFERENT THINGS. One is GAS OTHER IS LIQUID!!! This is not water injection, this is feeding hydrogen and oxygen gasses into the intake. Do you even know how fast gasoline burns? If you did you would know that modern vehicles burn less than 50% of the gasoline sprayed into the cylinder which is not efficient at all.
A variance of avg speed of 5mph in tank of fuel is sufficient to give inaccurate fuel consumption data and most are improperly measuring there rates of fuel consumption. It requires very steady speeds that are repeatable. Most just run their daily commute and believe idling times and speed variations average out. They don’t over the period that is measured by most and claims to the contrary are erroneous.
H2 doesn’t create a more eff burn, it provides cooling in form of water vapor in cyl. Same can be accomplished with direct water injection and turning down fuel rate w/ o2 sensor. Extra fuel is burned to reduce NOx emissions and messing with your O2 sensor is illegally modifying the vehicle emissions. The gasoline is already burned efficiently in most modern vehicles as is verified by so many posting that this has no effect on their fuel consumption.
I have a 86 chevy pick up, see tater waynes on you tube. I hooked the thing up and its working fine. went fron 14 mpg to 26.6 mph on a 4.3 litre v 6. I guess i just hit the sweet spot.
Notice any pinging from engine?
Hrm. I definitely don’t understand it but w00t!
no just a piggy back to retard the timing a bit.
So are you talking like a programmable chip? Like a Hondata?
To properly make it run,you will need more than to tap into the O2 and lean it out. I mean would you rather burn a hole in your cylinder or would you rather make it work right even if it costs a bit more? On some cars they have knock sensors which retard the timing automatically when they hear premature detonation however this is not the cure as it takes a while for it to react. There was a video of some guy running it on i think a corolla and you could really tell it was pinging bad.
Sounds expensive…
I thought all these guys were doing was changing the o2 sensor somewhat and voila. If you have to change all your ECU timings and shit this is gonna be a bit expensive and not very price effective for the average driver 🙁
well thats retarding the intake and exhaust ports and you gotta have special gears that allow you do that, but what i’m talking about is when the plug fires, not when the valves open. It’s pretty much all done by computer besides some very old vehicles that used mechanical sprockets that shifted depending on engine speed. You gotta use a computer chip that can allow you to trick the computer from the factory on the car (ECU) so it sends the signal later or at least so you can modify the signal.
Yea, but to retard the timings on a carb’d vehicle you just open the head and move the cam ahead or behind a degree or two?
even on a carb vehicle, you still need to retard the timing.The type of fuel system does not matter.Simply when the spark plug fires up,gasoline takes longer to ignite then hydrogen so the spark plug actually fires before the cylinder reaches the top of the stroke (Top Dead Center) so technically the fuel is already burning while the piston is still moving up.Now since hydrogen burns faster,you need to slow the spark plug a bit otherwise you get combustion while the piston is still on the way UP
Sounds difficult to do.
I think I want to hho boost a carb’d vehicle. sounds like it would be way easier.
No not yet. I’m looking for a some electronics that allows me to retard the timing since i dont feel like blowing through a piston. i drive a jeep which has a very low revving I6 engine and this is even worse with the wrong timing since premature combustion is even harder on lower rpms.
Yea for sure dude. I meant pretty much the same thing. Do you got an HHO boosted vehicle?
oh no no man dont get me wrong. No arguments here. I rather get the information straight then quite halfway and then start over a month after:) You know what i’m saying right? Many times you see those good thread on the forums where people start off and everything is good and all the sudden everything stops without any feedback or without anything being proven or not proven at all. I mean i rather know something doesnt work than have no info on it at all.
I made mine for like 10 bucks.
No need for one. The O2 sensor on the exhaust will sense how lean/rich it is, and adjust fuel accordingly. If that helps at all.
I have just finished building my own HHO generator, and it works a treat! Heaps of gas when hooked up to my car battery. Will be installing it this weekend. My friend met a guy from Sydney yesterday, who has the system in his 5.7l v12 jaguar. He is very excited about the initial results…close to 30% better mileage.Don’t listen to the sceptics…….let them continue to pay top price for fuel and pollute the environment. Their choice.I purchased the ebook from water4gas and have built my own to a slightly different design, but heeding their
advice on the overall setup. The technology works, and is nothing new. For the sceptics,this technology has been suppressed for almost 100 years. NASA uses it, so why shouldn’t we? Enjoy your experimenting.
It is a quite interesting post but quite difficult to understand for me –