hho generator on 1991 Ford F-150

this is the hho generator jar on my 1991 ford f150 with a 5.0L V8. i made it out of a 1 quart glass mayonaisse jar with a plastic cap. it has two 6 inch stainless steel bolts bolted to the cap, wired up to a fuse box under the hood, and is wired to a 30 Amp switch under the dash that i use to turn it on/off. it makes plenty of hydrogen and oxygen which is plumbed into the manifold vacumm on the intake. its supposed to up the mpg a little bit, but only time will tell, i havent gotten that far yet. any questions or comments are welcome, thanks for watching.

27 thoughts on “hho generator on 1991 Ford F-150

  1. PassingThru2Day says:

    First thanks for the vid., I have a 89 F150 5.0l myself. pls look at this guys location of his 2nd generator. I wonder if placing 2 separate hho generators gave him the results he got. See if this will up your mpg too. Thanks, Clearwater/Florida

  2. commando7144 says:

    i did see another set up for the oxygen sensor that worked like a plug fouler where the sensor is farther back from the exhaust flow.idk how that works tho

  3. mrcobes says:

    ALL alternators have an “extra” reserve of available power. IF we are doing this right, we are ONLY working with a reasonable amount of the “extra” power that’s available. A PWM (Pulse Width Modulator) device is used to adjust and control the amount of current (AMPS), your hho unit uses. 20 amps is generally a good starting point for most systems and is usually handled well with most alternators. IF you can achieve a 25-30% increase in MPG using ONLY available power, what’s the problem?

  4. mrcobes says:

    Most people are not going to see a significant increase in gas milage WITHOUT using some sort of o2 device (EFIE – used to offset the extra fuel the ECM will add BECAUSE of the extra oxygen passing through the exhaust pipe), and/or use of a MAP/MAF device (used to help control the air/fuel ratio) Each vehicle is different and therefore has different emission control devices that may need to be addressed. All we are doing here is “supplementing” the existing gasoline to burn more efficiently.

  5. mrcobes says:

    Furthermore, why do you think they call it vacuum? Vacuum occurs BELOW the throttle plates from the pistons drawing in the air & fuel ratio during the engine rotation. ABOVE thr throttle plates AIR PRESSURE exists at 14.7 psi., NOT vacuum.
    Another thing, research a gas molecule. A “regular” grade gas molecule contains 7 atoms of carbon (there for lubrication) and 16atoms of HYDROGEN!!! (C7H16) Now I’m no chemist but gas ALREADY HAS hydrogen and we are SIMPLY enriching what is ALREADY present.

  6. mrcobes says:

    I disagree. IF the hydrogen is entering IN through the air intake (WITH all the outside air that NORMALLY enters INTO the air intake), HOW is that “creating” a vacuum leak??? A vacuum leak is a leak that occurs at ANY point BELOW the throttle plate of the carburator. As long as you are feeding the hydrogen in ABOVE the throttle plate, you are NOT creating ANY vacuum leak!

  7. commando7144 says:

    it would be very efficent to put the hose as close to the intake plentum. what others are saying is to have the hose go into another container to capture water vapor being the (bubbler)

  8. mt8791 says:

    yeah i heard about those devices. havent considered looking into one just yet. the trucks been running fine like a champ. replaced the fuel filter and the mileage went up a bit up to 14. amazing isn’t? just basic maintainence effects mpg.

  9. commando7144 says:

    i would check the plugs if they are too lean like a white color i would look into a device they are selling which adjusts the oxygen sensor on the car to fool it so it doesnt richen the mixture of gasoline resulting in mpg loss i think its called an effy or effi they are custon made

  10. shituponshit says:

    bugger, you’ve obviously stuck your finger up your nose to far…lol you wouldn’t know a lean running engine if it sat on your face. why do you refuse to admit that HHO is present and that it is helping the combustion process. you must be one of those athiests who dos’nt believe it unless you see it, trouble is HHO is invisible. Truth is the fuel ratio changes from car to car, exspecialy the carberated ones, only the lates cars today are equiped with cp to make em run perfect air/fuel ratio,duh!

  11. buggar4466 says:

    Hydrogen will get out as its made without an air vent. All you are doing is creating a vacuum leak to the engine and casuing a super lean running motor. This will cause major stress on the pistons and rod bearrings. Two will be even worse. If it doesnt work without a vent it doesnt work. If it works with vents, then just make two large vacuum leaks to your engine without the HHO generators and BAM. Saved you time money and looking stupid.

  12. buggar4466 says:

    If you make your car go from a 12.0:1 to a 18.0:1 fuel ratio, you will see a large increase in mileage. This is a BIG mistake since 14.7:1 is ideal but almost all cars under a load run around 12.0:1 for engine safety reasons. Just makes the same leak with nothing attached and youll get the same results but better since your not putting a load on the alternator in turn loading the crankshaft.

  13. buggar4466 says:

    This disables the cars ability to maintain a correct a/f ratio. Your going to cause the car to run supere lean with the air leak caused by the device. This WILL give a temporary increase in mpg but at the sacrifice of the engines parts. People will see the same increase in milegae without the device with the same leak. Not a good thing since the manufactrurer makes a modest tune to ballance economy/power/life. Its all a scam.

  14. shituponshit says:

    I am working on the same model of generator …he seems to be missing a air intake, can’t get the HHO out if ther is no way for air to get in, should be a bubler on it with hose going into the water.

    Also I have found for a V8 that dual gens are required to get best gains, mixing at a rate of 1.5 teaspoons of powder. as differn’t amounts of soda make for a richer mixter but we went to far and added to much and melted the plasic that the wire was wraped on, so be care full.

  15. xbos2 says:

    wowowow this very well done I’m building a model but hydrogen booster but electronically automatisé\\\very gooddddd men take care

  16. mt8791 says:

    not much of an increase for fuel economy. maybe .5-1 mile per gallon. I think i need to modify or tweak my 02 sensor before i see any real gains. i am only expecting maybe 3 mpg max.if im lucky. so thanks for the interest and stay tuned.

  17. grizdog2004 says:

    What was the result on the feul economy? Was there an increase?

    Also, it looks like you just have two SS bolts in that jar connected to the wires outside. Can something that simple really make a difference? If so, I’m building one today!

    Give us an update on the feul economy, even if it didn’t help (or if it made it worse, due to your oxygen sensor).

    Thanks.

  18. Fuelfixer says:

    RE: SAFETY! Search this site for:
    HHO BOOM in my Car/ Lubobuba Creds to fearless examples as a WARNING. Lubo, U Da Man.
    W/O U I woulda gone off 1/2 cocked & BOOM!

  19. I found your blog on google and read a few of your other posts. I just added you to my Google News Reader. Keep up the good work. Look forward to reading more from you in the future.

  20. Max 1969 says:

    If you hook an open hose to your intake(under the carb or in back of the throttle body in FI)That’s a vacuum leak! If you run that hose to a sealed jar lid, and draw the air through water, that is a controlled suction and not a vacuum leak at all. The open hose would cause the engine to run very rouhg or die. Air drawn through a bubbler, will have no ill effect on the engine at all. In fact you would gain from just water in the jar, as a water/ mist injector!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *